Altruism is defined by an immense propensity to love all things. Altruists believe that peace and love are the highest virtue and the greatest means to an ends. Since the LGBT Civil rights movements began Homosexuality has been seen to be an extension of what the Hippies endorsed which is to save the world by loving everyone it. In this blog I will examine that there is a distinction between homosexuality, and this altruistic disposition to believe that only love of all beings can save the world.
The struggle for LGBT human rights has come so far, we receive support in the voices of youth who testify our plight from oppression, and yet there is confusion about psycho-dynamics which Lesbian, Gay Bisexual and Transgender individuals theoretically may ascertain as a condition of one’s sexual preference. I would ask if the condition based on premises that loving one’s enemies, and loving those whom one is oppressed by, can set the stage for anything other than further victimization, and further discrimination. Altruism as seen as a great propensity to love every single being in the world, as a testimony to love of self, and love of God, may have narcissistic, delusional, and unattainable consequences in retrospect to a more guided communication of emotion, which embodies sex as between two people, with body talk, and supplication of emotion that makes love blossom over the course of time between those who make love, and genuinely express it. Yet, I believe LGBT individual’s maybe viewed publicly as believing themselves to be a universal love which can save the human race, and each of us who live in it. This kind of advertised need to feel love, be love and be possessed by love, may be counter productive, and even set one on a path of denial and delusion, as one who turns to self, and finds a void can instill a sense of being victimized, and even self harm, when that person seems to only absorb contrary projections unto themselves. That is, in genuinely believing one ought to be an example of this love, when every emotion contradicts this display of emotion, the effect maybe consequentially negative.
Psycho-dynamics are vast, yin-yang may be one of the most reliable ways to show the transference of emotion between two loving people, and yet yin- yang is defined by that transference of male and female energy that ultimately finds a balance. Yin-Yang is not defined by loving those who show hatred towards us, who victimize us, and who oppress us. I propose that when anyone feels love that is either sexual or platonic, or a love of activity, or a love of a certain disposition towards nature, it should never be seen as a pejorative to save the world, and the inhabitants from all acts of negative accounts simply because one comes closer to feeling their self identification with others is being reciprocated. I believe that when people love one another, especially with the language that exaggerates homosexual affection in such a wide range of areas, as real love is reciprocated by one individual with another, that they can draw strength from it without having to sacrifice their identity or their self respect.
In this depiction of what is positive as what is transmuted by ideology to become negative, true love should ought never dispose of the reality of cause and effect. That love reinforces us to an emotional expression of feelings that emulate an intense projection from the conscious and unconscious mind, and yet sexuality if and whenever exploited to be heroic, or anything whose virtue is determined by a third party, to be manipulated as to assign spiritual axioms as a suggestive power, would undermine their intent which had been based on the proper use of the will.
Homosexuality ought not be defined by the same suggestive power that embodies, a more self sacrificing, selfish form a need to love everyone in, and the entire world. Homosexuality fulfills and satisfies a deep need to be human, it reinstates moral need which enables the expression of our love to be reciprocal, yet homosexual love making, is also that catalyst for change that can define humanity, integrity, and self respect, in a a cataclysm that is filled with likes and dislikes, as it defines a personal freedom, but is not one that teaches us that love when it is felt as an unattainable means which deprecates one’s compassion with false beliefs would ever become a positive influence. Human beings Learn one from each other with all that is positive and negative, and that is what comprises our past experience. Homosexuality teaches us the same, that our past experience with trial and error has ascribed us with attributes that are authentic. Authentic, but not unrealistic, or irrational, that maybe self serving, and can lead to self sacrificing motives that stem from an irradiate fashion of inviting others to treat you as they will, and with no more or less compassion or sympathy, for one who believes they have unlocked the mystery of life. No matter how alluring this may be.